• About Us
  • Legal Affiliations
  • Alternative Fees
• Global Network
• Practice Areas
• Our People
• Legal Updates
• News
• Events
• Diversity
• Community Involvement
• Careers
  • Summer Associates
  • Lateral Hiring
  • Staff Positions
• Contact Us
• Disclaimer

Meritas Law Firms Worldwide

Legal Updates RSS

Supreme Court Rejects Employee Privacy Claims and Invalidates Hundreds of Decisions Issued by the National Labor Relations Board

June 23, 2010

By: Daniel B. Gilmore

Last Thursday, June 17, the United States Supreme Court issued two much-anticipated decisions with potentially far-reaching consequences on the workplace.

To download this document, click here.

Share This Print This

Related Area

• Labor & Employment Law

Related Updates

• Employers Beware: NLRB Continues Close Scrutiny of Policies that Limit Employee Communications Through Social Media
• Supreme Court Recognizes Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Laws
• Controlling Abuse of Social Media in the Context of the National Labor Relations Act
• National Labor Relations Board Delays Deadline for Posting of Employee Rights Notice
• Recent Developments from the National Labor Relations Board
• Workers' Comp Reforms Benefit Employee, Employer
• New Legislation Levels Playing Field for Tennessee Employers
• Supreme Court Clarifies When Class Actions Are Appropriate in Discrimination Cases
• The Tennessee Lawful Employment Act of 2011
• Even Without a Union, Certain Employee Actions Are Still Protected by the National Labor Relations Act
• EEOC Publishes Final ADAAA Regulations and Interpretive Guidance
• Employees Who Make Oral Complaints Are Protected from Retaliation Under the Fair Labor Standards Act
• Employers Beware: OSHA Cracking Down on Texting While Driving
• Supreme Court’s Decision in USERRA Case Likely to Have Broader Implications
• The NLRB Warns Employers Not to Interfere with Employee Off-the-Clock Use of Social Media
• NLRB Proposes Rule to Require Notice of Rights to All Employees Covered by the NLRA
• Legal Update: Labor & Employment Law
• Labor & Employment Legal Update
• New Georgia Law Creates Greater Enforceability of Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Non-Disclosure Agreements
• New Federal Regulations Clarify Types of Work Teens May Perform
• Tennessee Court of Appeals Approves Employer's Use of Comprehensive Medical Evaluation Program, Dismisses Retaliatory Discharge Case
• Government Contractors and Subcontractors to be Required to Notify Employees of Rights under the National Labor Relations Act
• News and Developments in Labor & Employment Law
• Federal Appeals Court Clarifies When Vulgar Language Creates An Actionable “Hostile Environment”
• Now Available: Revised “Equal Employment Opportunity is the Law” Poster
• New Regulations Affect Employer Health Plans and Wellness Programs
• Revisions to the Americans with Disabilities Act
• Card Check Provision of EFCA Unlikely to Survive but Employers Still Need to Prepare Now for Pro-Union Legislation
• Inconsistent Application of Computer Use Policy Results in Unfair Labor Practices
• Important Changes to the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Law-2009
• Supreme Court Finds Reverse Discrimination Against New Haven Firefighters
• Why the EFCA is Bad For Employees, Or, How the “Teacher of the Year” Was Canned Because of Union Seniority Rules
• DOL Announces Aggressive Enforcement Plan for Employee Classifications
• Employee Free Choice Act
• Summary of Key Regulatory Changes to the Family and Medical Leave Act
• Special Report: Supreme Court Issues Trio of Decisions Important for Employers
• Government Contractors Will Be Required to Use E-Verify